There has been a significant increase in the application of advanced control strategies in the power industry. This session presents recent results in applying several of these strategies, including predictive control, robust H-infinity control, and neuro-fuzzy control to various power plant subsystems. Integrative efforts in overall power plant control and optimization will be presented, as well.

 

 

P013-“Dynamic NOx/Heat Rate Optimization”

Don Labbe, Bill Hocking, Invensys

 

Entergy White Bluff Units 1 & 2 are split furnace 850 MW PRB coal fired drum units constructed in the early 80’s. The plants were recently retrofitted with a modern DCS and achieved significant control and ramp rate improvement. Entergy desired to further improve unit heat rate and lower NOx emissions while maintaining or enhancing ramp rate capability. This required a dynamic optimization approach that addressed unit limitations such as O2 and steam temperature control during unit ramping, coal mill changes and soot blowing. A dynamic optimization system combining Model Predictive Control and Neural Nets operating at high execution rates was integrated with the DCS. The system provides tighter regulation of the critical ramping variables thus allowing the reduction of “operator margin” for heat rate improvements of greater than ½% and NOx reductions of greater than 20%. Through the dynamic multi variable control structure these improvements are maintained during dispatch operation, which is nearly continuous for these units. The system provides the added benefit of lower peak steam temperatures while raising the average steam temperatures, thus enhancing ramp rate capability while improving heat rate.

 

 

P050-"Advanced Control of Drum Level and Bypass Pressure on a Combined Cycle Heat Recovery Steam Generator" 

John Sorge, Southern Company, Pascale Bendotti, EdF, Joe Baas, Alabama Power Company, and Cyrus Taft, EPRI I&C Center.

 

Many combined-cycle power plants are changing from base load operation to daily cycling operation due to the sharp increase in natural gas prices.  Daily cycling requires that the plant control systems perform well during all phases of the operating regime from startup to full load.  Although conventional control techniques based on proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers have performed adequately over the years, advanced multivariable control techniques offer the possibility of better control system performance.  This paper reports on an advanced control demonstration project on a combined cycle heat recovery steam generator (HRSG).  The application is the intermediate pressure (IP) drum level control and the IP steam bypass pressure control.  The plant control system is an Emerson Ovation distributed control system and the advanced controller is implemented in an Ovation workstation as a C program.  A previous paper described the application selection and the plant model identification process.  In this paper the focus is on the H infinity controller design, implementation and testing on a development system.  Plant test results are expected to be included.

 

 

P026 - Robust Hybrid Control Strategy for the Boiler/Turbine Unit Full Operating Range in a Coal-Fired Power Plant”

Kai Zheng, Joseph Bentsman, University of Illinois, Cyrus Taft, EPRI I&C Center

 

Multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) robust controllers recently designed for the megawatt output/throttle pressure control in a coal-fired power plant boiler/turbine unit have demonstrated performance and robustness noticeably superior to that of the currently employed nonlinear PID-based controller. These controllers, however, have been designed only for the range of 150-185 MW around the 185 MW nominal operating point, exhibiting a significant loss of performance in the lower range of 120-150 MW. Through system identification, the reason for the latter performance drop has been found in the current work to be a noticeable dependence of the boiler/turbine unit steady state gains on the operating point. This dependence induces significant modeling uncertainty that degrades system performance. This problem is addressed in the present work via two control strategies. The first one employs the single robust controller based on the middle (150MW) operating point in place of the 185 MW one. This effectively reduces the modeling uncertainty over the entire range to approximately 50% of that associated with the previous design.  The second one uses hybrid controller synthesized through partitioning the full operating range into two sub-ranges and designing a robust controller for each of them. This permits attainment of the desired overall performance, while further reducing the modeling uncertainty to approximately 25% of that associated with the previous designs. Fast, smooth, and reliable switching between two controllers, as dictated by the setpoint change, is performed by a recently developed robust bumpless transfer algorithm. The single controller strategy features simplicity and ease of use, while the hybrid controller approach provides better robustness in face of uncertainty due to plant aging, soot deposits, etc. As demonstrated by simulation results, each strategy provides an adequate solution to the problem of robust control of a boiler/turbine unit over the full operating range.

 

 

P051-“A New Advanced Coordinated Controller for Boiler and Turbine of Coal Fired Power Plant”

Luc Deprugney; A. Girard, S. Maurin, Electricite DeFrance Research & Development and H. Jestin, Electricite De France Cordemais Plant

 

Cordemais Power Plant/Unit 5 is a 600MW once-through coal-fired plant. Designed to operate at base load, the boiler is very sensitive to load transients. Particularly, non linear rises in waterwall temperatures are frequently observed at the bottom of the boiler even during slow load drops. This is the main reason why the existing controller that coordinates the boiler and the turbine aims at protecting the boiler to the detriment of turbine performance (this control strategy is generally called turbine-following strategy). As a consequence, the plant does not provide ancillary services to the grid.

 

From a fleet optimization point of view, this inability strongly penalizes EDF. Therefore, EDF started up a project in order to allow Cordemais 5 to provide ancillary services, in spite of its boiler sensitivity.

 

The first stage of the project consisted in retuning the existing controller. However, the results of this optimization were not satisfactory at all. Indeed, the boiler-turbine system is a very complex non-linear and multivariable process that is not easy to control with PID-based controllers. As a result, EDF decided to develop and implement a new advanced controller (NAC).

 

The NAC could not be implemented in the existing DCS (MicroZ – YOKOGAWA), for it is essentially matrix-based. As a consequence, it was implemented in an industrial PC dedicated to the NAC. The operators can switch from the existing controller to the NAC thanks to a bumpless transfer system that was developed.

 

This document describes the stages that led to the implementation of the NAC at Cordemais 5.

The first part deals with the principles of the NAC and presents simulation results:

·         Limitations of the turbine following strategy at Cordemais 5

·         Innovative principles of the NAC – How to cope with boiler sensitivity.

·         Process modeling.

·         Comparison between existing controller and NAC in simulation.

The second part sums up the principles of the interconnection between MicroZ and the industrial PC.

The final part shows the results obtained on-site with the NAC, and details the economic benefits achieved. Cordemais 5 now has an ancillary services mode, which is compatible with a safe operation of the process (in particular regarding boiler sensitivity).

 

 

P023-”Intelligent Sootblowing (ISB) in the Coal Fueled Electric Power Industry – EPRI Perspective”

Jeff Stallings, Rabon Johnson, EPRI I&C Center

 

As the Electric Power continues to evolve, power producers are driven toward improved production while striving to meet changing EPA requirements.  Meeting these requirements has in most cases prompted plants to equip their units with SCR’s, FGD systems and simultaneously deploy advanced technology to maximize production.  Intelligent Sootblowing, one of those technologies, is the process of controlling sootblowers to operate only when and where needed.  ISB includes use of water in the furnace to control fouling and slagging from burning today’s fuels.  EPRI is promoting and collaborating on ISB projects with various power producers and over the past several years tested and demonstrated ISB technology.  This paper discusses lessons learned and benefits realized from those projects.  The paper presents a brief history of sootblowing technology, discusses various ISB technologies in use today, and the benefits and savings documented in the various ISB projects.  The paper also includes a projection of where EPRI expects the technology to be deployed and integrated in plants in the future.

 

 

P021-“Optimization Systems-‘Out of Control?’”

Jeff Williams, Emerson Process Controls Inc, Power & Water Solutions.

 

A western US Utility utilizing Wyoming coal was interested in deploying new technology to help reduce NOx and improve efficiency.  This paper will discuss the pitfalls of having the NOx reduction targets set too aggressively without a long term evaluation of the deep staged combustion and the operational impacts from aspects like water wall slagging. Balancing the full load operational requirements for five and six mill operation with a more suitable NOx target will be compared with the initial phenomenal NOx reductions possible when aggressive settings are used will be addressed. 

 

The facility has four units; this unit recently upgraded the control and instrumentation with a modern distributed control system (DCS) for the integrated automation of boiler control, burner management (BMS), feed pump turbine control (BFPT), data acquisition functions (DAS), wet scrubber control (FGD), steam turbine control, motor and pump start/stop , and balance of plant functions. The steam generator is CE / Alstom design with six levels of burners arranged in the T-fired configuration. This unit was commissioned in 1976 and has a 520 MW GE turbine generator. Unit 3 would be the first of a fleet wide initiative to deploy software optimization to improve environmental levels of NOx  while maintaining heat rate.