Natural oil technologies await their turn

"The drivers for the production and use of alternative fuels are clear. It's our goal to be a business partner and enabler to those with feedstocks and those who can convert those feedstocks to fuel," said Jamie Bohan during the "Alternative Fuels & Emissions Reduction" session Wednesday at Honeywell Users Group in Phoenix.
Drivers are:
An increasing population and demand for oil and fuel.
There is the volatility of the fossil fuel supply with the activity in Iran this week as a recent threat and example to the oil supply. Note the U.S. reliance on foreign oil will increase 30% through year 2030 said the International Energy Agency.
Environmental concerns as to the burning of hydrocarbons and the relationship to global warming abound in North America and Europe. The existing regulations and pending rules/legislation are staggering in their number and complexity.
Bohan is senior segment marketing manager, chemicals and pharmaceuticals at Honeywell. “Biofuels is a quickly changing landscape. The market took off and collapsed over the recent few years. There was the debate over the food versus fuel aspect as well as the land, water, and environmental concern attached to growing fuel. And of course the economy had its say too.”
Those were what we call first generation feedstocks. Bohan, UOP, and Honeywell see more potential in the 2nd generation feedstocks than in the 1st generation that did not work out so well. First generation includes sugars (sugar cane and others) and starches like wheat and corn. Oils (vegetable based) and grease fall into this category too.
Second generation feedstocks are biomass, which can be waste from the pulp and forest product industry like lignin, cellulose, and hemi cellulose, as well as other energy crops like switch grass. Also, include here oils from algae, jatropha, and camelina.
There are many challenges handling this feedstock mainly surrounding the logistics of collecting, transporting, storing, and preparing the biomass for transition.
The technologies to convert the biomass to fuel exist, and there are nearly 10 or so of them. Honeywell and UOP are active in this area and see partnerships developing between companies that make fuel and companies that produce or have access to large amounts of biomass. Oil refiners and papermakers is an example of this.
The UOP renewable vision is hydrocarbon biofuels. This approach builds on UOP technology and expertise. It produces real fuels instead of fuel additives or fuel blends.
It can leverage existing refining and transportation infrastructure to lower capital costs, minimize value chain disruptions, and reduce investment risk. Moreover, it will focus on using second generation feedstocks and chemicals.
“The UOP approach is to use the same biological feedstocks used to make ethanol and biodiesel, but convert them into gasoline and diesel molecules that are identical to their fossil fuel counterparts using refining type processes,” said Bohan. These are UOP’s natural oil technologies.
—Nicholas Sheble

Wireless wins in dire straits

Bryan McVicker transferred to ExxonMobil’s Beaumont, Tex., chemical plant in July 2008, but he got more than he had bargained for when Hurricane Ike tore through in September, leaving in its wake a broken levee, a plant flooded in 10 feet of water, and all electrical infrastructure destroyed. But after giving wireless a try (any port in a storm), McVicker and his team were sold on wireless benefits.
On Wednesday, at the Honeywell Users Group in Phoenix, McVicker, a Pyrolysis engineer at ExxonMobil, and Ken Routh, from the core engineering group at ExxonMobil Chemical in Baytown, Tex., gave their version of how they depended on wireless in this dire situation. “We were not allowed to go back to our offices or retrieve anything,” McVicker said. “It was all trashed. While employees worked out of hotel ballroom for several weeks, the entire organization had to restructure. When we returned to work, we found flares remained in service, but DCS and controls were lost. We were going to be in turnaround state for long time. We needed to make sure basic systems were in place to address potential hazards. I needed to make sure all core business units on site were adequately handling business preservation.” Having no previous experience with wireless, McVicker was hoping to supplement operator rounds, not replace them, as key process parameters during recovery.
Some of the challenges the company encountered included a weak infrastructure, no wiring, cabling, fiber optics, or permanent power. Also, they were limited in people because the instrument and electrician technicians and engineers were all focused on rebuilding the plant. So they contacted Honeywell to investigate wireless options. Within two days, the vendor had mobilized technicians, and wireless stations came to the site. Within 12 days, there was an initial startup with risk-based security and controls review and instruments limited to critical services.
As an expert called in to help, Routh’s role was to provide global support as a technical generalist. “Some of the biggest specs we had were quick response, and we wanted a fix that could provide everything,” Routh said. “We needed one vendor who provides everything from transmitters to operator interface. We needed 802.11 Ethernet backbone wireless because we had no fiber optic or cable. At least at that time, the vendor we could identify quickly was Honeywell.”
The Beaumont team implemented XYR 600 frequency hopping spread spectrum transmitters with five-second update rate. They initially installed nine transmitters, five-second update rate, with17 transmitters ultimately installed. The fix also included IEEE 802.11a wireless backbone mesh, four multinodes initially installed, with a final total of five, all powered with a solar panel (temporarily powered initially with generators).
With an operator shelter 1100 feet away from the transmitters, the team used just a couple of PCs, with one seeing use as a OneWireless server that did all configuration and wireless networking setup. “One of our security controls stipulation was this network had to be completely standalone,” Routh said. The only place to view the data was in front of a table in this operator shelter; there was no Wi-Fi capability. The interface was Honeywell HS Experion on a desktop PC.
“The initial configuration had two multinodes close together because of the tall structures in the plant and concern about interference,” McVicker said.
All in all, the wireless system made crucial device monitoring easier to use. It was staffed by console operators 24/7, with instrument monitoring and historization, flare pilot thermocouples, cold flare vaporizer TIs and LIs, and key utilities, such as firewater, potable water, natural gas, LP steam, and PIs.
Once the system was in service, operators immediately began using the system. They were able to troubleshoot systems with a proactive response to pre-alarms and alarms. At the end of the outage, data was collected. “The only thing we cared about was data appearing on the screen,” Routh said. “We decided we needed technical data toward the end, so the Honeywell folks in the Houston area spent a lot of time helping us configure and troubleshoot; we monitored seven key performance parameters for three weeks at five-second intervals.
In the end, there was no problem in the system with errors or retries. During this time, one of the multinodes failed, where there were two close together. “We were worried about transmitters being able to get to multinodes,” Routh said. “But we lost no data during that time.”
—Ellen Fussell Policastro

Wireless continues growth mode

In a down economy, wireless is one technology that continues to grow, and the potential applications just keep expanding.
“Wireless is gaining momentum throughout the industry,” said Norm Gilsdorf, president of Honeywell Process Solutions during the Honeywell Users Group Americas Symposium in Phoenix. “It is interesting. We are seeing the wireless kits and wireless mesh networks (selling) despite the economic conditions.”
The growth means it may be cost effective to put in a wireless system that fits a bit easier into budgets.
“Wireless growth remains extremely strong this year,” said Jeff Becker, Honeywell Process Solutions’ global wireless business director. “Most project budgets are under heavy cost pressure, so wireless is a great mechanism to keep the same functionality and scope but at a lower price point.”
One of the reasons for the heightened interest in wireless may be because the ISA100 Standards Committee on Wireless Systems for Automation voted to approve the standard, ISA100.11a, “Wireless Systems for Industrial Automation: Process Control and Related Applications.”
“Now that the ISA draft has been accepted to establish as a standard, we think that will clear the air and confusion and that will enable things, when that is finally adopted, to move forward at an even faster pace,” Gilsdorf said.
“It is a big deal for the industry,” Becker said. “We as an industry finally have an open, flexible, user-driven standard that meets all the requirements for field instrument use in process plants.”
In a nutshell, the ISA100.11a standard will provide reliable and secure wireless operation for non-critical monitoring, alerting, supervisory control, open-loop control, and closed-loop control applications. The standard will define the protocol suite, system management, gateway, and security specifications for low-data-rate wireless connectivity with fixed, portable, and moving devices supporting very limited power consumption requirements.
The application focus is to address the performance needs of applications such as monitoring and process control where latencies of 100 milliseconds are acceptable.
The standard assures operation in the presence of interference, harsh industrial environments, and with legacy non-ISA100 compliant wireless systems.
The remaining steps include approval by the ISA Standards and Practices Board and ratification by the American National Standards Institute. The committee hopes to publish the standard in August.
“It is a future-proof standard that has the legs to last us for a long time,” Becker said.
It is one thing to talk about standards and the theory behind wireless, but it is quite another to have actual working products out in the market.
Jason Urso, vice president of technology at Honeywell, unveiled, among the slew of wireless products, a manual gauge reader to wirelessly integrate manual gages at a low cost, a valve position sensor for remote valve position monitoring (for people who have multiple valves in field), and a flexline radar level gauge for accurate and reliable inventory control and custody transfer. “This flexline radar level gauge is enabled for OneWireless so it can be deployed in your tank farms” for safety issues, he said.
A simple case of wireless in action came to the forefront one year ago. One of the debates for wireless has always been about reliability, but Bryan McVicker does not have any doubt.
McVicker, a Pyrolysis engineer at ExxonMobil, came to rely upon wireless after Hurricane Ike devastated his chemical plant in September 2008. His plant was flooded in 10 feet of water, and the entire electrical infrastructure was destroyed.
“We found flares remained in service, but DCS and controls were lost,” McVicker said. “We needed to make sure basic systems were in place to address potential hazards. I needed to make sure all core business units on site were adequately handling business preservation.”
McVicker turned to a wireless implementation to quickly help with recovery.
Some of the challenges the company encountered included a weak infrastructure, no wiring, cabling, fiber optics, or permanent power. Also they were limited in people because the instrument and electrician technicians and engineers were all focused on rebuilding the plant. Within two days, Honeywell mobilized technicians and wireless stations came to the site. Within 12 days, there was an initial startup with risk-based security and controls review and instruments limited to critical services.
While the hurricane situation was clearly an emergency, and wireless came through, the technology is also working in every day environments.
“Users typically want a wireless solution to improve safety, efficiency, or reliability,” Becker said. “Wireless is almost always significantly cheaper than doing the same thing via wire, and in many cases wireless allows them to do things that were just impossible to do in the past.

Respond to right alarms

When alarms are going off left and right, the noise becomes deafening—metaphorically speaking anyway. Operators turn a deaf ear because they are overwhelmed by constant alarms.
With no documented alarm management process, Gary Godfrey, senior staff engineer in the control systems department at Saudi Petrochemcial Company in Saudi Arabia, knew this was not a good way to keep the plant running safely. Operators ignore alarms because there are just too many to deal with. “If you’re being told 20 times a minute something’s going wrong, you have no think time to settle in and know what to do about that alarm,” he said.
One of the problems is a management system via paper, and no alarm system performance measures. “Today if it’s not electronic, people don’t do it,” he said.
You need a philosophy for your plant well documented and well written, or you cannot do alarm management.
Audible alarms must have operator action. “If your alarm philosophy contains that one line, you’re 80% the way there. If there’s no action for the operator, and there is nothing they can do about it, then don’t tell them.”
You need a governing document, and you need site-wide buy-in. An alarm philosophy is not one size that fits all. It is going to be unique to your plant and practices.
Incorporate industry guidelines. “One thing we embraced was EEMUA, a U.K.-based organization that has the industry standard for alarm management” Godfrey said.
Include basic definitions: What is an alarm?
Be aware of alerts vs. alarms. Alarms you have to take quick action on. Alerts you may need to check every 12 hours.
Make sure you have alarm dead bands. This is key so you do not get chattering alarms. If it’ is just going to sit there and go in and out, you need a dead band there. Define values in percents or EU. Use PV clamping on indication points.
Set alarm priorities, such as emergency/high/low. Only 5% of your alarms should have emergency priority. High should be 1%. For that, you probably have a minute to a five-minute reaction time. Alarms that are low priority (i.e., the filter needs changing) can be attended to next shift. “You don’t have to get out there in the next two minutes. And remember; alarms are for the operators, not engineers.”
Pilot study gives “incredible” results
Godfrey and his team did a pilot study for six months, and “the numbers were incredible,” he said. There was an 83% reduction on one of the consoles in six months, and operators could respond in a timely fashion.
Information was kept in Excel with major columns including alarm description, reason for alarm, consequence of not alarming, expected operator action, response time defines priority), PVLO, PVHI, and other LCN parameters.
Only look at bad actors, and consider the 80/20 rule, he said. “We did a weekly bad actor review. Somebody has to own the alarm management. Empower someone to make decisions.” Owners in this project were control system engineers, production/process engineers, and operations representatives. Team membership continuity is crucial. Justify all bad actors. “Over time, you’ll build up a database of rationalized alarms online for operators in the future,” he said.
With one alarm per 10 minutes on average, Godfrey was pleased with the results of the study. But he cautioned alarm management is an ongoing process. “Don’t just do it once and walk away. You’ve got to walk before you run, so keep it simple.”
Other gems of advice included having management support for alarm management.
“In the future, we’re going to address standing alarms, reduce inhibited and disabled alarms, operator changes (top changed points and why), and operator changes per audible alarm,” he said.
— Ellen Fussell Policastro

Reconfiguration of oil refining and capacity likely

“UOP isn’t in the prediction business, but everybody wants to know what UOP thinks,” said Norm Gilsdorf, a former hand at the refineries services company and now president of Honeywell Process Solutions.
Margaret Stine laid out her and UOP’s take on the future of oil refining, the trends, and the challenges at the Honeywell Users Group in Phoenix on Tuesday. Stine is a director in the company’s process technology and equipment group.
As way of disclaimer Stine did, with irony, point out, “Do you remember this time last year we were using the term ‘soft landing?’ Well, that didn’t happen.”
Stine predicts growth in demand for oil and products will be around 1.2%. “We had our first up tick in demand in 16 months in May. That’s good news and a sign we think.”
There will be strong growth in non-OECD countries. The OECD is a group of 30 member countries who develop economic and social policy. Suffice to say, the wealthier countries are OECD, and the growth is in the emerging and frontier markets.
The number of additional refineries planned over the last several years has been great. The price of oil was high, gasoline prices high, and refinery margins were as good as ever.
“Though circumstances have changed,” said Stine, “the refineries planned for the Middle East will go forward no matter what. They can do this because they are guaranteed a source for crude, they can rely on themselves.”
There will never be another new refinery built in the U.S. Other planned projects are smaller or on hold. There is much unused refining capacity in the industry now.
“As well, newer refineries are very complex,” Stine said. “This is because of the quality of oil we produce these days. It’s more difficult. It’s more sour. In addition, with sulfur regulations as they are, the refining is more advanced. The Nelson Complexity Index will move higher.”
The Nelson complexity index is a measure of the secondary conversion capacity of a petroleum refinery relative to the primary distillation capacity. The higher the index number is, the greater the cost of the refinery and the higher the value of its products.
Stine figures we should prepare for the oil industry to restructure due to overcapacity. Many refineries will be vulnerable for closing because of their geographical location being far from demand or their capacity to handle the newer, messier oil dynamic and sulfur regulations.
Fundamentally, the shift in refinery location will follow the shift in wealth and development from the mature Western world economies to the third world and emerging ones in Asia and South America.
She sees a shift to diesel in the future too, again the move away from sulfur. Not surprisingly, the move to more efficient engines and hybrids are also on her horizon. “Ethanol eventually replaces gasoline,” Stine said.
Configuration changes in the refinery will include the technology necessary to upgrade the lower grade of oil, to handle the production of low sulfur fuels, and to produce higher-octane gas.
She sees the keys to the industry success as those traits of flexibility, efficiency, safety, and reliability. “That’s why we’re all here.”
— Nicholas Sheble

A cyber security focus safeguards plants

The key to growing, whether it is in a bad economy or a robust environment, is squeezing as much out of the process as possible because increased productivity and lower production costs means profitability.
In many cases though, it really does not take much to hack into a system, and as quick as a jack rabbit, your profit goes out the window.
That concept has occurred more than most would like to think, and that is one reason why cyber security is becoming a hot topic in the corner offices around the globe.
“Security has always been high on our minds,” said Norm Gilsdorf, president of Honeywell Process Solutions at the Honeywell Users Group Symposium in Phoenix on Tuesday. “We build a lot of security in the systems we put out there, and we continue to keep that an area of focus.”
“This is headline front page issues we hear about every day,” said Andrew Wray, senior global marketing manager for security at Honeywell Process Solutions. “It goes beyond firewalls; this is an open society, so cyber security is top of mind.”
“I don’t know if (security) has changed focus in the industry,” Gilsdorf said. “I think if you look at security going forward, I think the broad issue of security will get some more thought and development going forward. This is where we as Honeywell Process Solutions combined with our brother companies at Honeywell will be able to help our customers with solutions.”
The foundation for a system has to be secure. Security should not be an after thought; rather it needs to be the first thing a manufacturer has to think about before putting together their systems.
For a user to become totally secure, in quite a few cases, they have to change their mindset and commit to ensure a secure environment.
“We are historically a reactive society, and (security) is about being proactive,” Wray said. “Some of our customers are becoming more aware of the challenges of implementing a complete security solution.”
Mindsets are changing though, as users are becoming more aware on what to ask to find the right approach.
“I think some obviously are more aware,” Gilsdorf said. “I think others are trying to get up to speed and ask questions, and that is the role we need to play in talking to them and consulting with them to help them with what we know. I think this is an area that will have more discussion in the future.
One other area becoming more dynamic is the plant floor working with IT. Some trends show IT is taking a stronger role in a plant’s cyber safety.
“We are seeing a fundamental shift on who the decision makers are when it comes to security,” Wray said. “Ultimately, it will become the IT manager or the CIO to make sure the systems are the appropriate enhancement to the IT platform. So, yes, these folks are starting to take an increased role.”
Guarding against cyber attacks is obviously a key aspect to the ensuring a secure environment, but so, too, is the physical side.
That is why Honeywell was displaying at the users group their physical security systems that focus on ensuring against any intrusions at a plant.
One product they were talking about centered on the TWIC system. TWIC stands for Transportation Workers Identification Credential. This card swipes through a reader, and the system then passes the ID along to the TSA, which then authenticates the card holder, said Michael Reinert, principle project specialist industrial security, Americas for Honeywell Process Solutions.
The card also has an additional safety feature. “If there is an incident at a plant, people can place their card in a muster point in case of an emergency,” Reinert said.

Wireless networking has more than one way to go

“The most useful analogy to portray what has become the future of wireless automation in the industrial space is cell phone technology with its grid of receivers and transmitting towers,” said Soroush Amidi.
It is a wireless web, a mesh network of signaling devices connecting one another and relaying intelligence hither and yon.
“So it is with this OneWireless technology,” he said. Amidi is manager of wireless products at Honeywell, and he spoke Monday at the company’s annual users’ group conference in Phoenix.
It is a unique technology in that the nodes handle three sorts of transmissions including WiFi, ISA100.11a, and field I/Os.
WiFi is in many products using IEEE 802.11 standards. Its certification warrants interoperability between different wireless devices. Most personal computer operating systems, many game consoles, laptops, smart phones, printers, and other peripherals support WiFi.
The ISA100.11a is for industrial wireless users and operators. It provides for reliable and secure wireless operation for non-critical monitoring, alerting, supervisory control, open loop control, and closed loop control applications.
It sees to the performance needs of applications such as monitoring and process control where latencies on the order of 100 milliseconds are acceptable.
“The key benefits of this technology are that it’s ready for control applications, it’s easy to use, it lowers the cost of installation versus a hardwire network by 20-30%, it has the scalability to expand to 40 receivers, and it’s universal in that it embraces all the key existing wireless protocols,” he said.
Amidi also reported on the Wireless Compliance Institute.
The ISA100 Wireless Compliance Institute, of which Honeywell is a part, works on the effective implementation and understanding of the planned ISA100 universal family of industrial wireless standards through:
-- Compliance testing programs
-- Associated market awareness
-- Technical support to users and developers
—Nicholas Sheble

At one with integration

“One thing every company discusses in light of industry challenges is business optimization. But few are achieving the level they’re capable of,” said Jason Urso, vice president of technology at Honeywell, during his presentation at the Honeywell Users Group in Phoenix. Urso emphasized the importance of oneness—in integration solutions that is.
Best-in-class companies actually focus on three areas: Process safety and security, operations excellence, and business agility. But they treat it as a technology problem, weeding together islands of automation to achieve a single solution. Yet when companies do this, they’ve really “created a complex solution, and the benefits degrade then go away entirely,” Urso said. “Then the cost of maintenance is higher, and overall you’ve created poor visibility when it comes to maintenance staff.”
Jason Urso, vice president of technology at Honeywell, talks technology on Monday during a presentation at the Honeywell Users Group in Phoenix.
Honeywell’s goal is to take a more holistic and integrated approach, “to enable you to sustain business optimization over your lifecycle. It is called One Honeywell, and it offers the full breadth to treat a problem, not a series of point solutions. “We help you get started by designing the process up front with integrated DCS and fire and gas solutions, to help you integrate throughout your lifecycle. Then you can improve your overall process throughput while driving down process incidents.”
Delivery of One Honeywell is through a main automation contractor program that builds on the traditional concept of delivering on time and on budget. “But we go one step beyond; we deliver with business readiness on day one,” he said.
“The Honeywell Experion Platform protects and preserves the install base and is designed to work with a wide variety of field networks,” he said. “The PCBI function block is integrated with our C300 controller and can speak over Ethernet to any device that supports the ModBus TCP standard.”
Security is also one of the goals behind Experion. “We built it [security] into the platform; we didn’t add it in later,” he said. The newest release for Experion is the Series C steam turbine control, which “allows us to achieve integration between DCS and steam turbine control with two modules—speed input I/O module and accelerated cycle time, achieving increased efficiency between boiler, controller, and process control at your facility.
The C200 E controller platform enhances C200 to support additional memory, bringing batch manager to the C200 controller for faster batch execution to improve production.
Other additions to the Experion experience are Experion HS and Experion LS—tailored for smaller systems in specific markets. Experion HS provides a small typical SCADA solution, and Experion LS is for smaller batch and process systems.
To further quality the importance of oneness, Urso described UniSim Lifecycle Solutions, which help users get started in overall plant design. “Honeywell designs out instabilities before you start putting steel in the ground,” he said, “and you can use these models to train your operators as well as to check out your control and safety strategies and validate procedures before units come online.”
Honeywell has also acquired Maxon and Callidus to improve their business in burners, flare systems, thermal oxidizers, and vapor control systems. “We can bring you a broad range of burner technology for best-in-class levels of efficiency for process heaters,” Urso said. As far as fire and gas detection devices go, “we can deliver flame, smoke, toxic gas, and a range of alarming devices.”
Urso described the importance of integrating fire and gas detection with a hypothetical gas leak situation, whereby Honeywell gas detectors can pick up and alert fire and gas platforms, which can communicate with emergency shutdown systems, which can isolate the toxic gas leak, then communicate directly to the Honeywell C300controller (upstream or downstream). And all this is overseen by a single Experion interface—another testimony to oneness. “That’s the kind of integration you can expect with the Honeywell family,” Urso said, “to help you improve overall safety because you can respond faster and more accurately.”
As part of a litany of new products, Urso extended the oneness theme with a safety angle by announcing a manual gauge reader to wirelessly integrate manual gages at a low cost, a valve position sensor for remote valve position monitoring (ideal for people who have multiple valves in field), and a flexline radar level gauge for accurate and reliable inventory control and custody transfer. “Best of all, this flexline radar level gauge is enabled for One Wireless so it can be deployed in your tank farms” for safety issues, he said.
And speaking of accuracy, human error accounts for almost half of the mistakes made in the process, so Honeywell has laid the foundation with Experion Human Interface, which is well integrated with ProfitSuite for blending and movement automation solutions “so you don’t purchase a collection of point solutions. Once you have common human interface in place, the next place to improve is operator response; look at operator graphics and alarming display. In an abnormal situation, ASM graphics will help the operator respond faster and with more precision. We can help your operators respond 48% faster and more precisely,” he said.
Because startups and shutdowns are occurring less frequently these days, operators are out of practice. “In our application called Procedural Operations, you can automate your procedures to reduce variables and move them closer to execution, even for the least experienced operator.”
—Ellen Fussell Policastro

Honeywell president outlines challenges, trends

“There was a time I didn’t know what an exabyte was,” quipped Norm Gilsdorf, president of Honeywell Process Solutions. “I now know that it relates the grand scope of the data with which we’ll have to deal. In fact, it’s at the heart of our biggest challenge—data overload.”
An exabyte is a unit of information equal to 1000 petabytes or 1018 bytes.
Norm Gilsdorf, president of Honeywell Process Solutions, addresses an audience at the Honeywell Users Group Americas in Phoenix on Monday.
Gilsdorf addressed the Honeywell Users Group Americas in Phoenix on Monday. He outlined what he and his team see as the biggest challenges facing the process industries and the most important trends for which Honeywell is making plans.
Trends now and as we move forward include:
Ubiquitous sensors: “Sensors to me is one of the most exciting areas,” declared Gilsdorf. MEMS (micro electromechanical systems), smart dust, analyzers on a chip, wearable sensors, GPS (global positioning system) tracking for equipment and employees, flying sensors for security, leak detection, video as a sensor, embedded sensors (as on a shelf in a distillation column), and others all fall into this slot.
Wireless acting as a cost effective enabler that extends the control network and furthers sensing technologies and monitoring. This will enable us to address new regulations. We will monitor far away operations and applications. “On a 3,000-kilometer pipeline in Kazakhstan, they have numerous break-ins and diversions of oil, which they detect remotely using wireless pressure sensors.”
Convert data to actionable knowledge: This involves using online optimization models to invoke built-in procedures in the control system, to drive automated action and response by the control system. This slot includes soft sensors and the ability via simulation to provide the operator a way to work with what-if scenarios using real time data.
The final convergence of IT and process control will settle in embracing service oriented architecture (SOA) virtualization, cloud computing, and open systems.
Unify the automation layers: This entails the interplay and communication from level one on the plant floor including field devices to the top level where supply chain activities reside and will ensure there are role-based consoles displaying the information that the person at each level needs. There will be embedded batch systems. “We’ll bring MES (manufacturing execution systems) into the clean room without dirty paper moving back and forth in that restricted zone.”
Going beyond the plant boundary: This trend, started, ongoing, but to spread said Gilsdorf, would include an operation like one in India that webs, networks, and automates multiple wells, refineries, transportation, and retail outlets.
“We believe these six areas are the core of change in the future. I see a safer, more reliable enterprise to come,” said Gilsdorf.
—Nicholas Sheble

Innovation, imagination will spark growth

The economy seems to be slowly creeping out of its downward slide, but to get a faster return, it means the same old solutions just won’t cut it any more.
That is where innovation and imagination come in, said Frank Whitsura, vice president general manager Americas for Honeywell Process Solutions.
“Albert Einstein once said imagination is more important than knowledge,” Whitsura said during his morning kickoff presentation at the Honeywell Users Group Americas Symposium Monday in Phoenix.
That sentiment remained in place throughout the morning as Honeywell leaders talked about possible ways to guide users through these turbulent times.
When it all comes down to it, getting through these times means understanding and controlling the massive amount of data hitting plant floors every day.
“It is estimated that 40 exabytes of data will be executed this year alone,” said Honeywell Process Solutions President Norm Gilsdorf. “That is more than the previous 5,000 years.
“How do you manage the information generated, and how will it be consumed? All this data and all this pressure, it is all about how we manage this (information),” Gilsdorf said during his keynote address Monday. “It is about bringing the right data to the right person.”
“One thing every company discusses in light of industry challenges is business optimization. But few are achieving the level they’re capable of,” said Jason Urso, vice president of technology at Honeywell, during his presentation at the users group Monday.
Best-in-class companies actually focus on three areas: process safety and security, operations excellence, and business agility. But they treat it as a technology problem, weeding together islands of automation to achieve a single solution. Yet when companies do this they have really “created a complex solution, and the benefits degrade, then go away entirely,” Urso said. “Then the cost of maintenance is higher, and overall you’ve created poor visibility when it comes to maintenance staff.”
The time fearing the economy is over, business leaders and managers have to think and act as entrepreneurs. It is time to think of opportunities, not dwelling on the what has happened. Learn from the past, but keep moving forward. And innovation is critical.
One of the ways Honeywell is moving forward is also focusing on a relatively new venture called One Honeywell. About 18 months in the making, the company is looking to meld all parts of Honeywell into an entire factory instead of having individual components on the plant floor in the operations area and safety, to name a few.
Everyone knows there is greater financial instability and market volatility, or a rising need for improved safety and security, along with higher energy costs driving needs for improved energy efficiency, and more stringent environmental standards regulated by EPA/FERC and carbon tax regime. But the trick is to optimize.
“We need imagination more than ever. Economics are an issue, and some trends may lead to lifestyle changes,” Whitsura said. One Honeywell goes beyond the plant. “We have the technology and capability today.”

—Gregory Hale

Never assume; keep an open mind

Way back when in journalism school, students were taught, never assume. You never go into a story with a preconceived notion, because sometime the facts are not what they seem.
While that is a pretty simple concept to grasp and understand as a student, over the years it becomes more and more difficult to break away from the habit of assuming you know the outcome before you have all the facts. Some might call it experience; others might call it arrogance. Placing yourself in the story is not the way to go.
There is an author that is saying our own pre-conceived ideas about how things should work is actually preventing us from fixing problems such as climate change and world hunger.
In a speech at Ottawa's Carleton University as part of the 78th Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Frances Moore Lappé called for a wholesale revamping of the way we view government, the economy and democracy. If we manage to do it, she said, we can save ourselves from our own demise.
Lappé, made famous in the 1970s by her bestselling vegetarian cookbook Diet for a Small Planet, is an activist, author and co-founder with her daughter Anna Lappé of The Small Planet Institute. She said people today fear the potential for disaster, ecological and otherwise, and remain stymied thinking there is no cure.
Of course that thinking is incorrect and Lappé said we can do something, if we challenge five assumptions about the way the world works.
The first is that going green means "powering down," or reducing our consumption of energy. Lappé said all we have to do is stop getting energy from fossil fuels and start getting it from renewable sources like the sun.
The second idea to dispense with the idea that going green means an end to economic growth. What we have to do is change our idea of what growth is, she said.
The third idea she wants to challenge is the notion humans are by nature greedy, self-centered and materialistic. Under certain conditions, humans can be monsters, she said. But there wouldn't be 6.8 billion of us on the planet today if we didn't also have positive qualities such as empathy, cooperation and fairness.
The fourth idea she disputes is that we dislike rules. She says humans crave structure, particularly rules that make sense to us as individuals and which foster a sense of inclusion.
The final concept she wants to challenge is the idea our problems are so pressing there's no time for democracy, and only an authoritarian regime can save us. She believes the only hope for the planet is to trust in people and set rules that bring out the best in us.
Hmm, trust people that bring out the best in us. Sounds like a leadership issue.
Keeping an open mind and challenging authority to ensure everyone is on the correct path. Is that doable?
Talk to me.