Combustible gas detector sensor drift: Catalytic vs. infrared
By Kelly Rollick, Allan Roczko, and Leslie Mitchell
Catalytic bead combustible sensor technology, used for decades to measure combustible gas concentrations, dates back to the 1830s. The infrared spectrum was discovered in 1800. The 1950s saw a surge in infrared spectrum use for many technological applications, including gas detection. These distinct gas detection technologies offer advantages and disadvantages, with conditions determining the better choice for specific applications.
Catalytic bead sensor
The catalytic bead or “hot wire” sensor is the most common combustible gas detector type. This detector consists of four elements within a Wheatstone Bridge circuit; two elements are fixed resistors, and two are exposed filaments or pelements exposed to atmosphere. One pelement, the detector, reacts with combustible gas, causing a rise in pelement temperature, producing a resistance change resulting in bridge imbalance. The inactive pelement or compensator responds as an active element to temperature and humidity changes, keeping the bridge balanced during normal atmospheric changes. The detector’s resistance change and resulting bridge imbalance is proportional to the atmosphere’s combustible gas concentration. Catalytic sensors respond to any combustible gas or vapor to which they are exposed. This technology, in service for more than 80 years, has always been robust as well as easy to install and use.
Because the sensor runs hot (surface temperature ~500°C), as does a light bulb, it can burn out. The cause may be a filament breaking open and can be preceded by an upscale drift, as the filament thins out as metal is vaporized. This process causes resistance to climb and the bridge circuit to become unbalanced, due to age, impurities within the materials, or repeated high combustible gas concentration exposure. A second mode of catalytic combustible sensor drift is caused by corrosion, mostly from combustion by-products. Hydrocarbon combustion always produces water and carbon dioxide; halogenated hydrocarbons such as methyl chloride or difluoroethane also produce corrosive materials such as hydrogen chloride. These materials combine with water and form enough acid on basic sensor elements to attack weld joints and base metal components, introducing another variable into the active sensing mechanism and displays as baseline drift. Drift direction, positive or negative, will depend upon which side of the bridge corrodes at a faster rate.
Another drift mechanism is absorption of liquid material by porous metal flash-back arrestors. If the material is of low vapor pressure (i.e., oil or high-flashpoint solvents), it will evaporate at a very slow rate and introduce a continuous source of hydrocarbon to the sensor until it is all finally “cooked” off, returning the sensor to normal operation.
A notable safety hazard is that of flashback arrestor saturation, as gas and vapors are blocked from entering the sensor and are therefore not detected. In addition, the catalyst may be affected by inhibitors such as lead or silicon that may be present in the sample, reading as span loss rather than baseline drift, and eventually leading to a completely inactive sensor. Due to combustion reaction, catalytic sensors require oxygen to operate. Catalytic sensors cannot read gas concentrations below the LEL (limited by fuel) or above the UEL (limited by oxygen) and simply burns all available fuel. Operators may be required to investigate alarm conditions using another instrument to verify status.
Infrared combustible sensors
Infrared (IR) combustible gas detectors offer solutions to all previously mentioned problems. This sensor type consists of a single IR source, a beam splitter, and two detectors. One detector is used to monitor the characteristic hydrocarbon wavelength. The other is a reference that monitors an atmospheric “window” where no IR active gases are normally present. Infrared energy is emitted from the source, passes through the gas cell, and is reflected back to the detectors. If no hydrocarbons are present within the gas sample, then energy reaching the detector is the same. If, however, some combustible hydrocarbons are present, they will absorb some IR energy at that wavelength, thus reducing the amount received by the analyte detector.
The reference detector always receives the same amount of energy; the difference between the two detectors will be proportional to the amount of gas present in the sample. The gas sample enters and leaves the cell unchanged. Nothing has been transformed, substituted, or removed from it. As the IR source ages, its energy level may be reduced. Because there is only one source, the energy level reduction will affect both sensors equally, and no imbalance is detected. If optical materials (window and mirror) are dirty, the instrument can detect an unacceptably low energy level and signals INSTRUMENT FAULT. A simple cleaning returns the instrument to normal operation. If liquid has splashed onto the optics, the INSTRUMENT FAULT signal will warn users of the situation, and the cleaning operation is again required.
No extremes of temperature are needed or created for this detection method, resulting in less stress on construction materials. Since no combustion occurs, no corrosive combustion by-products are produced. In addition, an extremely stabile sensor baseline is produced. Finally, all IR detector active components are housed in a sealed chamber behind an inert sapphire window, isolated from the sample. Even the most corrosive stream components cannot attack the source or detectors due to this hermetic seal. Since all electronics and active components are sealed away from the combustible gas environment, there is no need for a flashback arrestor, providing the added advantage of improved gas response. The close coupling of the electronics to the IR sensor does however limit its high temperature operation. Exceeding the operational temperature limit can cause IR sensor drift or failure. Due to component precision and assembly, IR sensors have higher initial cost than do catalytic detectors. IR sensors do not require oxygen to operate; however, they do not detect all combustible gases (for example, hydrogen), as they are limited to detection of hydrocarbons.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Kelly Rollick is an MSA Applications Engineer. Allan Roczko is the MSA Product Line Manager, Permanent Instruments. Leslie Mitchell is a marketing writer with MSA.
Return to Previous Page