Protection or degradation
Separate the ‘quiet’ cables such as analog I/O lines, digital I/O lines, or LAN connections
Motors starting, stopping, switches on and off, controls blinking in and out … it is a cacophony of electrical clatter.
In today’s industrial environments, electronic devices, signal and power wiring, and other electrical plant/process equipment often interact to create “noise” or electromagnetic interference (EMI) problems, which can degrade critical measurement and control signals.
Proper grounding and shielding techniques can help reduce or eliminate these problems and maintain signal integrity.
Three basic elements are required in order for a noise problem to exist:
A noise source to generate the noise
A receiving device, which the noise affects
A coupling channel between the source and receptor
The objective in electromagnetic compatibility is to minimize, divert, or eliminate one of the three elements necessary for a noise problem.
Any piece of plant equipment or wiring can develop an electric charge, or potential, which we express as a voltage. If this charge changes, then a changing electric field is generated, which can couple capacitively to other equipment or wiring.
We can model capacitively coupled noise as a current. This type of noise is dominant when a circuit or termination has high impedance because the noise voltage generated at the receiver is the noise current, in, times the receiver impedance, Zin.
An easy and effective way to minimize capacitively coupled interference is to use cable shielding. The shield is a surface on which electric fields can terminate and return to ground without affecting the internal conductors.
Capacitive coupling equivalent circuit
Shielding is only effective against electric fields if it provides a low impedance path to ground. A floating shield provides no protection against interference. There is still a small capacitance between the noise source and conductor due to imperfections in the shield, holes in a braided shield, and most importantly, due to the length of conductor extending beyond the shield. Attending to these remaining parasitics to avoid ‘leaky’ shields is important.
The correct place to connect an electrostatic shield is at the reference potential of the circuitry contained within the shield. This point will vary depending upon whether the source and receiver are both to ground or whether one or the other is floating.
It is important to ground the shield at only one point to ensure that ground currents do not flow through the shield. In most applications, the shield ‘ground’ should not be at a voltage with respect to the reference potential of the circuitry.
If it is, then this voltage couple to the shielded conductor. The exception is when using guard shields, where the shield is intentionally at a potential to prevent current flow in unbalanced source impedance. Guard shields are normally in use only in extremely sensitive applications or when high common-mode rejection is required.
The capacitance between two conductors is inversely proportional to the distance between them. Therefore, another simple way to reduce capacitive coupling is to increase the distance between the victim cable and the source cable.
It is always a good idea to route ‘noisy’ cables such as power input wiring, motor control wiring, and relay control wiring separate from ‘quiet’ cables such as analog I/O lines, digital I/O lines, or LAN connections.
When a cable carries current, there generates a magnetic field. One can visualize the direction of this magnetic field for current flowing in a long straight wire using the right-hand rule.
With the right-hand thumb pointed in the direction of the current flow, the fingers will show the direction of magnetic field lines. Imagine the complicated magnetic fields that exist near heavy electric machinery or where many cables are in a common tray.
Lenz’s Law states currents will necessarily flow in conductors by moving them through a magnetic field. Similarly, a changing magnetic field will induce currents in a stationary conductor that is in the field. Since most wiring is in place, varying currents are the usual cause of magnetic coupling.
Look at a magnetically coupled noise model. The primary means of noise coupling can be determined by changing the signal source impedance, Rsignal.
If one reduces Rsignal, capacitively coupled noise will decrease while magnetically coupled noise will increase.
Magnetic coupling equivalent circuit
Magnetic coupling is much more difficult to reduce than capacitive coupling because magnetic fields can penetrate conductive shields. Two types of loss, reflection and absorption, characterize how a shield works. Reflection loss relates to the ratio between the electromagnetic wave impedance and the shield impedance. Absorption loss is directly proportional to shield thickness and inversely proportional to shield material skin depth. It is highest at high frequencies and falls rapidly at low frequencies.
Fortunately, there are other ways to reduce magnetically coupled interference besides shielding. Using Faraday’s law, we can derive the voltage induced in a single turn of wire by the magnetic field lines that cut the loop.
Making the general assumptions that the flux density (B) is sinusoidally time varying, as it would be for AC power line currents, and B is constant over the area (A) of the loop, the following expression is obtained:
Vn = jωBAcosθ × 10-8
Here, B is the value of the flux density in Gauss, A is the area of the loop cut by the magnetic field lines in cm2, and q is the angle between the two.
These three parameters are all under the control of the system designer. We can reduce the magnetic field by separating the source of the field from the receiving loop or by twisting the source wires.
Reducing the loop area is possible by routing the conductors that form the loop closer together or by reducing the length of the conductors. The simplest way to reduce magnetically induced interference is to use twisted pair wires. This applies both for shielded and unshielded cables and for interference caused by shield currents or from other sources.
Twisting the wires forces them close together, reducing the loop area and therefore the induced voltage. Since the currents are flowing in minimum loop areas, magnetic field generation goes down. The effectiveness of twisted pair wire increases with the number of twists per unit length.
Shielding for all noise
Improper termination of the shields to ground can destroy potentially effective shields. A low impedance path to ground is essential in order to realize maximum shielding benefits. ‘Pigtail’ connections from a shield to ground have inductance, resulting in impedance that increases with frequency.
This type of connection will work at frequencies below 10 KHz, but it will cause problems at higher frequencies. The use of short connections with large cross-sectional area minimizes the inductance of a pigtail, but the best connection is a 360° contact between the shield and connector or chassis.
Solid shields provide the best theoretical noise reduction solutions, but they are more difficult to manufacture and apply. Shielding most cables happens by using a braid for improved flexibility, strength, and ease of termination. Braided shields are less effective than solid shields because they only provide between 60% and 98% coverage of the cable.
Decreased effectiveness is more prevalent at high frequencies where the holes in the braid are large compared to a wavelength. For maximum shielding, reliability, and ease of use, cables with combined shields are available, which use both a solid layer and a braided layer.
Grounding systems carry
In industrial environments, ground systems carry signal and power return currents, form references for analog and digital circuits, bleed off charge buildup, and protect people and equipment from faults and lightning. Any current flow in a ground system can cause differences in potential.
Lightning strikes or other transient events can generate hundreds to thousands of volts of potential difference. Taking the ground system into consideration from the beginning is important in order for the circuit or system to work in the intended environment and pass interference, emissions, and safety requirements.
Proper grounding is dependent upon many factors such as the frequencies and impedances involved, the length of cabling required, and safety issues. When designing a ground or troubleshooting a ground problem, it is first necessary to determine where the current is flowing. When several kinds of grounds coexist, the current may not return by the assumed path.
The most desirable type of ground for low frequency applications is the single-point ground. It is best to avoid the series connection, or daisy chain, when sensitive circuitry or cabling is involved because return currents from the three circuits flow through the common ground impedances linking the circuits.
The ‘ground’ potential of circuit 1 is not only determined by its return current through impedance Z1 but also by the return currents from circuits 2 and 3 through the same impedance. This effect is common-impedance coupling and is a primary means of noise coupling.
The preferred ground is the parallel connection. It is usually more difficult and more costly to implement because of the amount of wiring involved. Determine first the circuit common-impedance coupled noise immunity when choosing between these ground configurations. Most systems use a combination of both topologies.
Flowing ground loops
Ground loops exist in a system when there are multiple current return paths or multiple connections to “earth ground.” Current flowing in a ground loop generates a noise voltage in the circuit. The most obvious way to eliminate the loop is to break the connection between the transducer and ground or between the receiver and ground.
When this is not possible, isolation of the two circuits is a universal way to break the loop. Isolation prevents ground loop currents from flowing and rejects ground voltage differences. A popular method of isolation involves the use of signal conditioners based on transformers or optical couplers. In either case, the common-mode noise voltage appears across the isolation device internal to the signal conditioner. Noise coupling is now down to the parasitic capacitance across the isolation barrier.
Typical coupling capacitance in an opto-coupler is 2pF, or 0.5pF for shielded devices. It is possible to further reduce coupling by using LED’s, photodiodes, and fiber-optic cables. Faraday shielding can also work in transformers to reduce coupling.
Optical couplers are primarily for digital signals because their linearity is not always suitable for use in analog circuits.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Impedance is the opposition to electrical flow.
Capacitance is the property of an electric nonconductor that permits the storage of energy.
Coupling is the method of connecting two circuits together. Circuits connected with a wire are directly coupled; circuits connected through a capacitor or a transformer are indirectly coupled.
Magnetic flux is the flow of magnetic force, represented as lines of force.
Magnetic flux density is the normal magnetic flux per unit area with the units being Tesla or Gauss.